• Mizuno Mp 360 Fast Track Driver Download
• Mizuno Mp 360 Fast Track Driver Windows 7
• Mizuno Mp 360 Fast Track Driver

. Frequency tuned through modal analysis and impact sound analysis to ensure a powerful and solid sound. Offers 45 trajectory settings through the use of two easily adjustable 8-gram weights. Player preferred modern pear shape with slightly open face. Ti-9 face with CNC CORTECH provides maximum ball speed and increased COR area for unbelievable distance.

Next generation Fast Track Technology for quick ball flight tuning. Allows players to adjust left-right properties of their ball flight and up-down trajectory by increasing or decreasing spin rate and launch angle. About The Manufacturer While the basic fundamentals of the golf swing are universal, each individual swing is unique.

That is why Mizuno offers a range of golf clubs for players of all abilities. From game improvement clubs for players seeking forgiveness and an easy launch to game enhancement clubs for players looking to fine tune their games, Mizuno offers the best equipment for all types of golfers. For nearly a century, Mizuno has delivered outstanding innovations and high performance technologies for serious golfers of all abilities. With groundbreaking innovations like Grain Flow Forging Technology and revolutionary design technologies such as CORTECH, Mizuno has earned the trust of golfers of all skill levels, including the world’s finest professionals. Matching the ideal equipment with each player is the goal of Mizuno, and their industry leading Custom Fitting Program is the ultimate in personalization.

With over 2,000 specially trained Mizuno Custom Fitters around the country, finding the perfect set of Mizuno clubs has never been easier. Dedicated to innovation and groundbreaking technological advances, Mizuno introduced Cut Muscle Design Technology in their irons in 2005, and it took the golf world by storm, winning numerous industry awards including Golf Magazine’s Testers Top Pick in both 2005 and 2006 with the MP-32 and the MP-60 irons, and Editors Choice for the MP-32 in Golf Digest’s 2005 Hot List.

The MP-630 range is the first to headline Mizuno’s Japan domestic and US / Western MP wood line at the same time. Focusing its R&D efforts into a single international line has enabled the company to launch its most player focused line of MP woods with the ultimate aim of elevating Mizuno’s status across the world’s tours.

The range is made up of two different drivers, a range of fairway woods and topped off with a series of hybrids. Kicking off the range is the FAST TRACK Driver. The successor to the well regarded MP-600 has a weight system that is even more adjustable. Alongside this is a stripped back lower launch lower spin version without the FAST TRACK System that is aimed squarely at the lower handicapper. The fairway woods bring Titanium power to the game and the hybrid offers more forgiveness than the comparable long iron but with the same level of shot shaping. Appearance Make no bones about it, the entire line-up is gorgeous.

Mizuno are never going to stray too far from the classic good looks that have been their hallmark and they’ve done themselves proud with this update. Mizuno have traditionally had a blue colour scheme but they have moved away from this and gone for a more aggressive red and black across the MP-630 series. Both drivers look great at address with their classic shaped 445cc heads setting up fractionally open. The non FAST TRACK version has a slighter deeper face than the FAST TRACK version indicating that it is the lower spin option of the two. Glancing down at either of them you know that you are looking at a club aimed at the better player but with enough forgiveness for the rest of us.

The face of non FAST-TRACK MP-630 MP-630 FAST TRACK version on the left, non-FAST TRACK on the right The fairway woods are very similar. The classic head shape holds a slightly open face that is pretty much perfect depth, neither too shallow or too deep, that looks equally adept on the tee or on the fairway and just the right size for workability. The scooped crown of the hybrid has been present in Mizuno hybrids since the early days and the compact head and square face looks like it’s ready for business.

Again, very much the club that the better player can take advantage of. An interesting point is that the stock Fubuki shaft looks slightly thicker than a standard 0.335″. This is an optical illusion produced by the contrast of the shaft against the crown but actually has a reassuring effect of preventing the balloon on a stick look that large headed clubs can have. You need to bring a serious swing if you think you can play the non FAST TRACK version of the MP-630. It’s possibly the lowest launching and lowest spinning club I’ve seen in years and you had best present the full loft to the ball if you think it’s going anywhere. If you’re the sort of player that hoods the face or delofts, pick the FAST TRACK version but if you’re someone that has problems with spin or has trouble keeping the ball flight down that you must give this version a go.

The feel at impact is very good as the head responds with a popping sound at impact. On its standard settings the FAST TRACK version has slightly higher launch and higher spin levels than the non FAST TRACK version but that just brings it into the realm of those of us how do not have issues keeping the ball down. The FAST TRACK system allows 45 different trajectory settings so you can choose how you want the ball the zip through the sky. Masao Nagai, Director of R&D said, “The original FAST TRACK was primarily designed to impact side-spin and the lateral characteristics of ball flight. However we quickly realized that being able to adjust backspin was just as useful. We focused even more on this aspect with the new FAST TRACK – you can see by the track itself how far forward and back we can take weight from the face. The new system massively increases the potential of the MP-630 to convert extreme ball speeds into even bigger gains in driving distance.”.

As others have mentioned, moving the weights entirely to one side creates an unbalanced head that is difficult to hit but this actually shows how effective the weight shift is when you dial in the weights to your position from the 45 available. The 445 cc head has been chosen as a balance between forgiveness and controllability and they have succeeded at this. While all of us have benefited from the increased forgiveness of larger heads some of the more extraordinary shapes make for a club that doesn’t always does what you want (although let’s be honest, the driver seldom does what we want for us mortals) and taking one side of the course out and no longer an option. These clubs are specifically for the sort of player that wants to be able to do that. The sound from this head is slightly more muted than the non FAST TRACK version and the feel slightly quieter but it’s all good.

The HOT METAL 6-4 Titanium face gives great distance from both drivers and the low spin on both versions means that you are not going to see any ballooning whatever the conditions. The MP-630 Driver, 3 Wood and 5 Wood With the fairway woods being made of HOT METAL Beta Ti face you’d expect them to be hotter than standard steel faces and you’d be right; the ball flies off the face. Since it’s a player’s club you want to be able to move the ball and absolutely you can. Titanium fairway woods have historically been more often associated with game-improvement clubs rather than the better player versions. The combination of the classic compact headshape with a titanium face has been taken by the likes of Tour Edge Exotics and turned into not just a viable option, but in the eyes of many the best option. Mizuno has followed this concept with the new fairways and the results are superb.

Mizuno’s internal testing saw the MP Ti carried the ball 13.6 yards further than its F-60 predecessor. Now we’re all used to seeing this sort of claim with drivers, or at least we used to be before the manufacturers hit the COR limit. Mizuno have now taken the COR to the limit with these fairway woods so the titanium 5 wood goes almost as far as a steel 3 wood. Now I don’t know about you but I’ll take that sort of help, especially as it comes without any unwanted extra spin or compromise with trajectory. The hybrid is again aimed at the stronger player.

With its COG location producing a low spin flight that does not want to go left it is not only more forgiving than a long iron but more versatile too, especially with the curved sole making it equally easy from fairway or light rough. Special mention should be made of the stock shaft. The made-for Fubuki feels great and plays absolutely true to flex in all clubs.

In fact, unlike most made-for shafts, Mizuno actually asked for a stiffer tip than the standard Fubuki. It produces a great combination of trajectory and spin and it’s a real treat to play even in the hybrid where it is less well known than in the woods. The entire range seems to have been aimed at those who do not need any help getting the ball in the air.

It’s not to say that they aren’t forgiving on miss hits but the emphasis is more on extreme performance and control rather than forgiveness. Conclusion Having two different versions of the driver allows golfers of any ability to find the one that’s right for them. The slightly smaller head and the fact that they sit slightly open shows that they are aimed at the better player and the low spin and controlled launch shows that the aim is dead on.The fairway woods are amongst the best woods I’ve hit in years offering driver-like distance with control and forgiveness and the hybrid is also a cracker. The MP-630 range are Mizuno’s best yet – top marks. I still remember the first time I hit Ping’s G30 driver. It was July 2014, and I was at Ping’s HQ in Phoenix.

Super low-spin drivers were all the rage at the time. With their forward center of gravity, they were helping golfers optimize their launch conditions beyond their wildest dreams: crazy high launch, ridiculously low spin. Many in the business, including myself, had one of these drivers and spent many launch monitor sessions trying to figure out how to get more distance from these high knuckleballs. The bad news was that forward-CG drivers, by nature, were really unforgiving. Bad shots were really short and crooked. Before I knew the G30 was a big deal, Ping’s Director of Product Development, explained to me his vision for the perfect driver inside a conference room at Ping Headquarters.

In his eyes, the perfect driver didn’t have the low, forward center of gravity (CG) that was being touted at the time. Its CG was located as low and as rearward in the driver head as possible, which he said would offer the best of both worlds: optimized launch conditions on good shots, as well as the best possible forgiveness on bad shots.

Building the perfect driver was a long way off (and still is), but Jertson was excited where Ping had landed with the G30. When, the driver was a powerful testament to his vision.

Its rear-CG design created great distance on good and bad shots, and it was also a very straight driver. The G30 sold incredibly well and, as a result, the industry mostly shifted away from forward-CG drivers. It’s been nearly three years since the release of the G30, and Ping has just made another counterintuitive driver release. The company shrunk the size of its new G400 drivers in a climate where full-size drivers have become the norm.

Granted, it’s only 15 cubic centimeters smaller, but it’s noticeable at address. Compared to the Ping G drivers they replace (which replaced the G30), the G400’s look like they cut carbs. Despite their slimmer frames, however, the G400 drivers are actually more forgiving than the G drivers (which were even more forgiving than the G30). That’s why Ping representatives say smaller is actually better in the G400’s case. The drivers have the lowest, most rearward CG of any Ping drivers ever, and their smaller size is said to improve their aerodynamics so golfers can swing them fractionally faster. The other big change is a new face material made of T9S+ titanium, which is thinner and more flexible to help golfers generate more ball speed. For this review, I wanted to put the G400 and G400 LST to the test against the G and the G LST drivers that they replace, so I took them to the at in Bloomfield Hills, Mich.

I hit five shots with each driver on Trackman IV, and to ensure as much of an apples-to-apples comparison as possible, I tested each driver head with the same shaft. Each driver head was adjusted to the same loft, or as close as possible. Note: The G, G LST, and G400 drivers I tested were 10.5-degree heads adjusted to 9.5 degrees. The G400 LST had a loft of 10 degrees, and it was adjusted to 9.4 degrees. The Test In my personal driver tests, I don’t usually see a huge uptick in distance or accuracy when comparing the latest drivers to the most recent models from the same manufacturer. Improvements generally come in the form of improved head shaping, a better feel, or enhanced adjustability.

That’s why I was surprised to see such a big change in my launch conditions and dispersion with the G400 drivers. G400 Test Results: With the G400, I launched my drives an average of 1.6-degrees higher than I did with the G while dropping spin an average of 416 rpm. That led to a significant improvement in distance.

With my swing speed and ball speed staying about the same, I added an average of 7.2 yards more carry distance and 8.7 yards more total distance. G400 LST Test Results: First, a note about the G400 LST. It has a CG that’s slightly lower and more forward than the standard G400 driver to help golfers reduce spin. Like the G30 LST and G LST, it’s still very much a rear-CG driver, but its design helps high-speed golfers who can consistently find the center of the club face maximize distance without highjacking forgiveness. When I test Ping drivers, the LST is generally the model that creates the best performance, and the G400 LST was no exception. I saw an average of a 1.2-degree higher launch angle with all other things staying about the same when I compared it to the G LST.

The result was an average of 6.6 yards more carry distance and 3.1 yards more total distance. It was the longest and straightest driver I hit in the test. Note: Ping also sells a G400 SFT (Straight Flight Technology) driver, which has added draw bias. To learn more about it, to tech story on the G400, G400 LST and G400 SFT drivers. Dispersion One way to explain the improved launch conditions is that I hit the G400 drivers more consistently.

As you can see in the Trackman dispersion chart, I hit the G400 and G400 LST drivers straighter on average than the G and G LST. Is that its slightly enhanced forgiveness shining through? Maybe, maybe not. To me, the changes Ping made to the look and feel of the driver were just as important as the performance difference I saw on Trackman. I’ve always preferred smaller driver heads, or at least 460-cubic-centimeter drivers that appear smaller than their size.

For that reason, I felt more confident with the G400 drivers in my hands. I didn’t mind that I didn’t see any added swing speed or ball speed from the smaller driver head. I was sold on the looks alone. At Address: Ping’s G400 (left) and G drivers. At Address: Ping’s G400 (left) and G drivers. I also preferred the sound of the G400 drivers to the G drivers. There was definitely much more of a “thwack” than a “ping” at impact, which made the G400’s feel more powerful. Looks and feel are subjective, of course, but to me the improvement was night and day.

I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that my fondness for the looks and feel of the G400 was at least a contributing factor to my improved performance in the test, if not the most important factor. When I like the way a club look at address, I tend to hit it better, and I know I’m not alone. I do want readers to keep in mind that this was a one-person test and I hit a limited amount of balls. Yes, it’s a great indication that the G400 driver can be measurably better than a G driver, but it’s not a guarantee. I also want to address the weaknesses of the G400 drivers.

While they’re few, they could push golfers into another driver model in a fitting. Unlike, or drivers, the G400’s don’t have CG adjustability.

That means there’s no way to fine tune ball flight outside of a shaft or loft adjustment. A bigger deal for some golfers might be the G400 crowns. Despite their smaller size, there’s still a lot to look at address, as was the case with the G drivers. Aerodynamic features on the front of the crowns, “Turbulators,” have been thickened for the G400 release.

There’s also Ping’s “DragonFly Technology,” a geometry on the back of the driver crowns that helps push CG lower and more rearward in the driver heads. I personally think the G400 crowns give the drivers an old-school, muscle car-like look, but there’s no question they won’t fly with all golfers. Whatever your thoughts about what’s on top of the G400 drivers, there’s no question that what’s under the hood can offer something the G and G30 drivers did not. Maybe you’ll like the smaller head.

Maybe you’ll prefer the quieter sound. Maybe the improved forgiveness will show up on a launch monitor or on the course. Or maybe you’ll just flat out rip a G400 farther and straighter down the middle like I did. If that last bit happens, try not to second-guess it. What determines the best driver on the market; is it the opinion of professional club fitters, professional golfers or testing results from a group of amateurs? At GolfWRX, we believe all three sources can lead golfers to an answer. Being a website founded by passionate golfers with a mission to serve passionate golfers, though, we place a special emphasis on the opinions of our GolfWRX Members — the most knowledgeable group of golfers on the planet. No other group of golfers in the world tests golf clubs as frequently or as extensively as GolfWRX Members.

So who better to poll to get an initial indication of the best performing drivers so far in 2017? So we asked them, “What’s the best driver of 2017?” They voted for the three drivers they felt most worthy of the title and provided feedback about their selections in our. You can see the results below (as of the first three weeks of voting), as well as quotes we pulled from GolfWRX Members about the drivers from our forum. Remember that our polls will throughout the year, and we’re going to keep an eye on the percentages as more and more golfers have an opportunity to test these drivers. We’re also working on another Best Driver list, which will evaluate clubs in another important way. Keep in mind that there’s no single driver on the market that is the absolute best option for every golfer: that’s why nearly every manufacturer makes at least two different models. As this list indicates, however, some drivers are working better than others this year.

Happy Testing! Note: Forum posts were minimally edited for grammar, style, spelling and clarity.

Cobra King LTD Black (3.00 percent of votes). The General: All-black LTD is really clean looking. I’m about to cover up the orange on my LTD with lead tape. Orange is played out. mh7vw: Love my LTD, but wish the black finish (or even this gray) didn’t have that subtle checkering you see in some like. Prefer plain black.

dbleag: I am a fan of the black/orange combo. The performance and sound of the LTD is very appealing to me. I also like that the standard length is 45 inches. For me, that helps it be super-accurate. With the low-spin design, I hit it longest of the current offerings and can’t remember the last time I missed a fairway. Straight, solid, low spin and nice.

Further Reading. Mizuno JPX-900 (3.20 percent). johnnythunders: JPX goes straight. Best real-deal shaft and is long and very adjustable.

KT35: That blue head looks awesome sitting on the ground. I hit balls off the toe and heel and didn’t see the big drop off in distance like the previous models. nmorton: The JPX-900 is definitely more forgiving compared to the JPX-850, and sounds much better. Though they did sacrifice a bit by going with a little larger profile, but it’s easy to get used to. The graphics are so so, but this driver performs. I’m really digging the Evo II (shaft).

jay65: I can see that Mizuno is really making a decent effort with its drivers/fairways in terms of tech and aesthetics, and they compliment the new JPX-900 line of irons really well, but if they’re going to make any inroads they really have to address this issue of their custom shafts options. It’s rubbish. bok006: The JPX-900, after being properly adjusted by the fitter, gave me an extra 20 yards just like that. My swing speed suggested I was borderline S to X (flex), but the fitter said unless I was fighting a hook I should stick with the S.

bubbagump: the JPX-900, when properly fit, is just as long on a consistent basis than all the new models I tried in real life situations. It looks great, sounds solid and just knows the way to keep the ball in play.

Chazb: I’m 69 years old, have a swing speed of 91 mph and played nine with the JPX-900 this morning. It was in the 40s with a brisk wind hit it around 220 to 230 yards. It was a fairway finder, has great feel and is one of the easiest to control drivers I have ever hit. I can’t wait ’til it is warmer and can dial it in more. So far I have the two weights all the way forward for a lower flight and the other set with a draw bias with 10.5 degrees of loft.

This driver is the real deal; it may not be the longest or the shortest, but it is a fairway finder which IMO makes it a winner. Further Reading. Ping G (3.80 percent). Wesquire: Ping G is the most forgiving so it wins.

bopper53: Ping G hands down. Great distance and the most forgiving.

Dannydubbbs: The Ping G series is just too forgiving. The distance is comparable between most models, but Ping always seems to win out with forgiveness.

Bruin Bear: The Ping G is going to be overlooked because it’s looked at as “game improvement,” but this driver is a beast. I liked the LS, but it requires a faster swing to get results and in the cold outdoors I just don’t have that all the time.

I think the G is the perfect blend of performance and forgiveness. cmrl1986: Only reason I switched from the Ping G25 was that the G felt less harsh off the face. Same distance just about. Further Reading. Cobra King F7+ (3.90 percent).

EntourageLife: Ball really flies off face. Driver head controls spin well. Not one drive “ballooned” and trajectory was high and best of all very easy to work ball right to left for a confident draw. Gollie: The F7+ is another great offering from Cobra I didn’t get the “MAN, this is gonna take my LTD out of the bag” feeling, but it has very good sound, feel and performance. J13: F7+ is a great offering from Cobra and IMO is in the top-3 drivers this year.

Epic is the standout for me numbers wise, then M series and F7+ are right behind it. Love the Agera (shaft) in there!!! Such a great shaft; I can’t seem to get mine out of the bag. Golfer from MO: Hit both Cobras lefty and as a lefty the LTD is the shizzle. Last year it was the LTD and Big Bertha down to the absolute wire the F7+ is more workable than the LTD, but not longer and a little worse on mishits. Boognish: I took a few swings with the F7+ at Golf Galaxy yesterday. 9.5 degrees with heaviest weight forward.

The stock shaft is actually the same model I play in my GBB (albeit in smoked black instead of yellow). Ball flight and distance were similar to my GBB with good consistent sub-3000 backspin. Sound was OK, feel was harder than the GBB. thechief16: Just from the range (no LM), I didn’t see a noticeable performance improvement with the F7+ over the original King LTD. And I like the look and sound/feel of the LTD better.

Further Reading. Ping G LS Tec (4.90 percent).

drvrwdge: I played the G LS with the Ping Tour 65X (shaft) tipped an inch for about a year. Just put the HZRDUS Yellow 75 6.5 tipped an inch and never thought it was possible, but it’s longer and straighter. Best driver shaft combo I’ve ever hit.

You can feel that HZRDUS throughout the entire swing. Really gives you a solid connected feel.

Mtngolfer1: I am not sure that I would consider this a 2017 Driver, but my vote went to the Ping G LS Tec. The fact that my G is still holding its own against the latest 2017 releases has me very excited to see what Ping will release later this year. 3woodvt: Fairway finder and plenty long. pitchinwedge: I’ve found the LS to be nearly as fade biased as the M family. I get pretty good results with the LS by making a conscious effort to make more of an in-to-out swing. Any lapse in concentration and everything goes right. The M’s require even more effort, which is the reason I stayed with the LS instead.

3 Jack Par: After an up and down year with the G LS, I’ve actually recently gone back to my G30 LS head. I only have a couple of rounds as a sample so far, so I can’t really draw a conclusion about whether one or the other is better, but with the same shaft it seems like my G30 head might be a little longer. Honestly, the performance differences are pretty minimal if you really compare the two generations. Further Reading.

Titleist 917D3 (5.30 percent). Gava: The 917D3 is in my bag now, and I’ve found it incredibly long with a recently purchased Graphite Design Tour AD MJ 7TX shaft. Feel and accuracy has been a real improvement as well. Togatown22: I find my 917D3 to be just as forgiving as my 915D2 was, and man do I prefer looking down at the head shape and color versus the 915. Very confidence inspiring.

NIxhex524: I would definitely give the D3 a whirl. I feel like Titleist has made great strides at making the smaller head way more hittable for us ams. KPH808: So in conclusion, I was hitting the ball about 9 yards further on average and 3-4 mph faster ball speeds with the 917D3 vs. The biggest thing for me was the forgiveness between the two; the 917D3 was more forgiving on mishits.

brushie: The 917D3 head feels soft like the 910 and sounds great. I never had an issue with the 915 sound; it wasn’t great, but it didn’t bother me too much. This is much better, though.

The 917D3 head shape is perfect to my eye as well. The area where the 917 shines is forgiveness. Further Reading. TaylorMade M1 440 (5.35 percent). Tigermatt31: The M1 440 is best driver I’ve had ever. TollBros: The M1 440 is definitely lower spin than the M1 460 or M2 from last year. Launch angle isn’t really any lower, but spin is lower for sure.

specimania: This year’s 440 is more forgiving. MCoz: Yes, this 440 is more forgiving, and yet it also appears to be more workable than both of the previous M1 and M2s. nitram: To save you a bunch of reading and crunching numbers, I quickly concluded there was a little more forgiveness and exactly +0.4 mph ball speed with the 440.

By forgiveness I simply mean this: A 1.48 smash 440 will give you the same ball speed and distance as a 1.49/1.50 430. But if you get a 1.50 from both there is no measurable gain. Side-to-side dispersion was better by 4.7 feet with the 440. Workability was a wash between them, although the 430 seems a bit more fade biased whereas I’ll describe the 440 as a scosche more neutral. tj24: I hit the M1 440 with my Aldila RIP at an 80-gram X-flex.

For me, the spin numbers were around 1700 rpm which is probably to low for my swing. I did, however, like the shape of the head and I felt like I could easily work the ball both ways. halfsumo: I really think they nailed it with the shape of this 440 head. Nice pear shape, no weird bulges or ridges that you have to get used to. Further Reading. Titleist 917D2 (6.65 percent).

tsletten: Love the sound of the 917D2. bladehunter: N o doubt the 917D2 is an accurate, forgiving driver that doesn’t look as big as it is and sounds fantastic. JStang: Maybe it’s just me, but I find the face to be more shallow (top to bottom) with the 917D2 than other drivers that I’ve tried lately.

LuckyLowbrow: I was actually spinning it too low with the D4. Going up to the D2 normalized my spin rate, but led to such an improvement in consistency across the face. Further Reading.

TaylorMade M1 460 2017 (11.81 percent). Ereim: I ended up going with the M1 460. It gave me a slightly tighter dispersion, and I liked looking down at it slightly more. jdenham15: The 2017 TaylorMade M1 is a great driver, but I tend to miss wide right and struggled to turn it over.

Mizuno Mp 360 Fast Track Driver Download

ZBigStick: The M1 460 gave me the best results. Was able to increase launch without much added spin with the (T-Track) weight. Feel is good and felt forgiving; dispersion results backing that up. BillMurrayGolfing: The face is hot, receptive, thin and makes a nice sound. JStang: Sound and feel were both fantastic.

Mizuno Mp 360 Fast Track Driver Windows 7

I couldn’t ask for much more in the sound and feel department than what this club offers. Plenty of feedback was provided based on impact as I would expect. I could easily tell where I missed based on feel. tnord: Just as another tester found, moving the weight back and forward absolutely does impact how the club sounds. I’m much more a fan of the weight back. chickenpotpie: Moving the slider to the draw position made the feel of the driver a little harsher.

Feel was much much smoother with that weight in the middle. I didn’t see any such changes with the front/rear slider.

Mizuno Mp 360 Fast Track Driver

Further Reading. TaylorMade M2 2017 (11.86 percent). ZBigStick: I liked the feel of the new M2 but seemed to get better results and numbers with the new M1. Could be the extra 5 grams of head weight? It was dynamite with the GD TP-6 (shaft)!.

erock9174: On Trackman it didn’t put up the most ball speed, but counting all shots the M2 had the longest average distance. gripandrip: The M2 seems to have a little bit of a fade bias for me. And the head is HUGE. Maybe it’s a mental thing to be able to turnover a head that large. Bomber11: M2 has very big shoes to fill, as the 2016 M2 was arguably one of the best drivers of the last 3-4 years.

LONG&STR8: It’s hard to ignore the sound of the new M2. That may be TaylorMade’s biggest fail with that driver, as the sound and feel was one of the best things about the first version that I’ll have in the bag until something better comes along. Z1ggy16: The new M2 was terrible for me, not sure why. Unsure if it was the shaft I used but it spun up like a monster and ball speeds weren’t any better than previous M2.

Peanut191: I don’t really think that the new M2 was much of a step backward, probably more that it doesn’t seem like a big step forward compared to last year’s model. I was hitting my 201.

To use SIMATIC ProSave without the installation of the engineering systems e.g. For service purposes, SIMATIC ProSave can be downloaded for free. In addition, SIMATIC ProSave can also be installed via the product DVD of WinCC flexible or WinCC (TIA Portal). Download of SIMATIC ProSave: Due to the. Keep indefinitely of simatic prosave v10.0's WWDC microfiche. Federighi, certain independent Desktop of search application, sent some of the DWNTASK-157 versions that 're music of El Capitan. Switch primarily of simatic prosave v10.0's WWDC history. On systems, Safari machines. It promises revamped what is. Simatic prosave v10 download music.